Blade inspection
automate-first · A
Cheap to do manually, expensive to check — automating this frees up the most time for the least verification risk.
Owner: Quality
Instrument 02 · Portfolio Map
Where does your portfolio actually sit?
The three cards below are example use cases. Add your own with the form underneath — they're saved in this browser, same as the rest of your Playbook.
Weld package review
use-design · A
Expensive to do and expensive to check — only automate if you invest in a good review interface (see Instrument 01).
Owner: Engineering
Supplier evidence triage
use-rule · B
Cheap either way — a simple checklist or rule is enough; AI is overkill here.
Owner: Quality
70% of portfolio value sits in appraisal.
SEQUENCING · BENEFIT VS. EFFORT
If you could only start one, which one?
Benefit is this use case’s share of total declared portfolio value. Effort is its production cost plus the control burden its own risk class already requires (Instrument 04) — not a separate estimate to argue about.
DO NEXT · 1
Above-average portfolio value, and its own risk class doesn't add much control burden on top of the production cost.
- — Blade inspection
SEQUENCE DELIBERATELY · 0
Above-average value, but production cost and risk-class controls together make it expensive to stand up — plan the interface investment (Instrument 01) before committing a date.
BATCH LIGHTLY · 1
Below-average value and cheap to stand up — worth doing, but not worth a dedicated initiative on its own.
- — Supplier evidence triage
DEPRIORITISE · 1
Below-average value and expensive to stand up once its risk class is accounted for — the weakest case in the current portfolio.
- — Weld package review